seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and apply Section 302, emphasizing the importance of a fair and just legal system. It truly is crucial for society to understand the gravity of this offense along with the need for stringent punishment to discourage possible offenders and make certain justice for that victims and their people.
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not apply, as the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, somewhat he has been acquitted in the criminal charges based on evidence and it truly is properly-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted inside the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all long run purposes. The aforesaid proposition has long been established at naught with the Supreme Court of Pakistan inside the case of the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety days. In the event the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will then solution the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times with the department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided with the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.
Section 302 on the PPC deals with one of many most significant offenses in criminal law: murder. In this weblog post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, discover the punishment it entails, and evaluate some notable case laws related to this particular section.
Allow’s target what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
This guide provides important insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case law, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
Accessing free case legislation sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and anybody seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
VI) The petitioner is driving the bars due to the fact arrest, investigation on the case is complete, he isn't any more demanded with the purpose of investigation and at this stage to maintain him driving the bars before conclusion of trial will provide no beneficial purpose.
Using keywords effectively can be crucial. Take into consideration using synonyms and variations of your keywords to ensure you capture all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
This article delves into the intricacies of the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case here legislation, to supply a comprehensive understanding of its implications and realistic applications.
A decreased court may not rule against a binding precedent, whether or not it feels that it really is unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. If the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the law evolve, it may well both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow for just a judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
To receive notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become offered, please enter your contact information under.